Dames and Damsels, Maidens and Muses, Flirts, Hussies and Drama Queens, come one, come all to the Cinema Sanctuary
Chic-Flick Trailers
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
THE ROMANTIC DRAMA: We're talking some serious chic-flick action...
The American Film Institute has made many top 100 lists of movies in their series called AFI's 100 Years and even included a list for all of us chick-flickers; AFI's 100 Years...100 Passions that includes the top 100 love stories in American film. Now as I go through this list I recognize most of these films as Romantic Dramas. These are the chick flicks (most of the chic but not always) that get nominated for Oscars and are given the respect they so rightly deserve in the film industry. A lot of this has to do with the themes of historical events and the realism in style that this genre focuses on. It's true, usually these movies are better written, directed and acted by all parties, but I wonder if this is inherent in the genre or maybe something else? This even falls under The Academy Rules, a drama is respectable no matter what the content while a comedy is mindless fluff that is only made worse by a romantic storyline. But I digress; these movies are some of the top features of all time and I'm really excited that girly movies can fall into this category. So here's my breakdown: The Epic I, myself, didn't even think to include The Epic as a part of romantic drama until I came across Box Office Mojo which told me that the top box office romantic dramas include a lot of current romantic epics (Titanic, Cold Mountain, Out of Africa, Pearl Harbour, The English Patient, etc). Now I have to say I am a little biased on this topic because these are some of my favourite movies of all time and I really think they have something in them for everyone. Out of all romantic dramas you are most likely to drag your friends, family and even your boyfriend to an epic.
The problem is: The men seem to die a lot. Count them out: Denys Finch Hatton (Out of Africa, 1985), Jack Dawson (Titanic 1997), Danny Walker (Pearl Harbour, 2001), Inman (Cold Mountain, 2003) and The Drover was originally supposed to be killed at the end of the most recent epic, Australia (2008). I have a bit of a feminist problem with this: do they kill the men off because to kill a woman off is less forgivable? This, of course, is different in The English Patient, based on Michael Ondaatje's 1992 novel. I'm finding disappointing trends in this genre that I would like to be stretched and interrogated a little because the last thing we need is for another chick flick sub-genre to be generic.
But keep 'em coming: No matter what I say, I still love these films. The exciting thing is that most of them are top notch; in fact the only epics I can think of that fell under par were Pearl Harbour and Troy(2004), probably because they are such a large undertaking and have such large budgets, but that's achievement for the genre itself.
The Tragedy of the Genre Critics, reviewers and any old movie snob will tell you that Dramas have more substance than the generic comedy or action film, which I mostly think is true but because of the content that is usually paired with this film genre (war, historical events or people, etc.) not because it necessarily has better people behind or in front of the camera. I'm sure many people don't even consider these movies chick flicks but Wikipedia says they are as well as an actor named Daniel Stern, in a video on AFI, even calls Titanic (the top grossing romantic drama of all time) an "epic chick flick". I felt so validated, I can't even tell you.
The problem is: I just can't handle all the sadness, depression and lack of hope. Now this is not in every film in this genre but if you make a list of all of these movies, I promise you it will be very difficult to make a substantial list of those with happy endings. And yes, to a chick-flicker, that is a problem, but as always, stay tuned for what I call "a better alternative".
The saddest of the sad: Just think about watching these movies one after another and you might see what I mean:Legends of the Fall (1994), Brokeback Mountain (2005), Atonement (2007), Evening (2007) and then throw in some of the classic love stories and any epic that I listed and you might just have an emotional breakdown. The reason for this goes back to why Aristotle thought tragedy was better than comedy in Grecian times. Serious issues with serious consequences makes us think and feel about what is really important, which is actually pretty fantastic. Call it a reaffirmation of life, but look for my picks with a little more hope. Let's call it bittersweet: Now, I have no problem with a little sadness, a little tragedy but sometimes you've had a bad day and the last thing you need is to emerge yourself in someone else's extreme problems. That is why women turn to the fluffier of chick flicks, because they need a little distraction and, most importantly, hope. So my picks for romantic drama might fall towards the ones with bittersweet endings and less tragic circumstances than one person can handle in a sitting.
The Classic Love Story The romantic storylines in this genre usually stem from some of the most popular plays, novels and other written work of all time. The tragic circumstances of star-crossed lovers and impossible circumstances has its roots in the classic stories of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, the Arthurian legend of Guinevere and Lancelot, and the legend and popular opera by Richard Wagner, Tristan and Isolde. Writers, directors and producers are smart in the sense that they stick to what has worked for centuries by adapting these love stories or just making new versions of them in cases like Baz Lurhman's Romeo and Juliet, Kevin Reynold's Tristan and Isolde,the musical version of Camelot (1967) and Jerry Zucker's First Knight(1995).
The best of the bunch: Well, in my opinion anyway. Almost all of these have bittersweet endings with lots of hope that do exactly what Aristotle wanted but don't emotionally damage you in the process: Shakespeare in Love (1998), Possession (2002), The Notebook (2004), Walk the Line (2005), and Jane Eyre (2006).
I am alway so unsure about adaptations. Somehow they make people too lazy to read the original book (which is often better than the movie). But on the other hand, I really love films like Sense and Sensibility. Tough call. But I do try to read the books before the movie comes out. One of my favourite examples is Atonement. I read the book and immediately fell in love with it. It is one of my favourites and I always hoped there would never be a movie adaptation. But after watching the movie I was quite impressed by it. It doesn't come evne close to the book, but as a movie, it is great and I enjoyed watching it. But everyone should still read the book. I guess, they just have to be seen as completely different things.
I know a lot of people feel that way about adaptation and I try to understand it but as a movie-lover first who then became a book-lover, it's hard for me to see them together as a unit. I find film and books so entirely different that I look at the writing of the screenplay, portrayal of characters, directing, editing as all belonging to one medium that has nothing to do with "staying true to the novel". I love adaptation and I think it takes some of the best stories out there and gives them new meaning and visual substance (though not all good, for sure) because I really love the medium generally but it's different for everyone. I really respect the ambition of adaptation over everything. I can't be harsh about it because then some of my fave movies would never exist. Of course, read the book. But it'll be different experience and sometimes not as good (I will be nice and not give you my list) and sometimes better (Lord of the Rings, Ella Enchanted, Harry Potter, Jane Eyre, and so much more). But I don't think it's a requirement or that it somehow makes you less of a fan because you love the movie and not the book or even vice versa. Film is just as substantial as written work. Some of us are visual learners and it doesn't make us lazy. Thanks so much Vanessa!
You really think HP is better as a film? I kind of think the films are "kiddyfied"...I love them, don't get me wrong, but the books are way more interesting and scary (coming from a 25 year old...haha!) I havnt finished reading LOTR..too long..too tedious..so I agree with you there!
I don't necessarily mean better, mostly just as good or better. HP is difficult because there are moments in the films that never happened in the books. And every HP film is different, Goblet of Fire sucked as a movie and rocked as a book. But Order of the Phoenix was better as a movie and Prisoner of Azkaban was amazing as a book and a film. I just love seeing the stories visually in film. LotR is hard too because the first seven or so chapters (before you meet Strider) are really difficult to get through but after that I couldn't stop, and I was 15 or so. I really love the movies though because they're more modern and have moments that weren't in the books. I have a theory about books being turned into movies that I was going to save for a post but I will post it here:
If a book is flawless and fantastic than the chances for the movie are not good. Book-lovers will complain that it's not as good and it will most likely be true. But for the books that aren't so perfect, maybe they lack plot, character development or interesting dialogue, they can only get better with a good screenwriter and director. It happened to the fifth Harry Potter, Order of the Phoenix, and I was rooting for Twilight as well. It definitely happened with any Nicolas Sparks novel that has been made into movies. Thanks Vanessa!
I want to re-establish the chick flick as a film genre instead of a movie goer's guilty pleasure by dropping the k in chick and inventing the chic-flick. This is my attempt at justifying my taste in movies. I like the good ones with strong female characters, witty dialogue, and a story that's fresh and keeps your interest. My criteria: substance, integrity, intelligence,chemistry and a little bit of hope.
Hi! I'm Vanessa and I'm a Canadian University student with a passion for entertainment. I like to think I'm pretty active in my knowledge of movies, books, and TV. I'm the one who knows what's happening before everyone else I know and the one people ask for recommendations and opinions because I always have them. My only warning is don't ask unless you mean it because when it comes to what I like I am picky, harsh, and stubborn. But if you can deal than I'd love to talk to you about it anytime. And one last thing, I am a girl, and a girly one at that but I expect substance and integrity, so don't judge.
It’s a sad day when I go to my local movie theatre and watch a brand new
film starring one of my all-time favorite actresses – Jenna Ortega – and
instead...
The best movies with women on Netflix Netflix has taken over our lives!
It’s a joke, but the truth is that many of us pay a monthly subscription to
be ab...
Godard was the inspired maverick of the French New Wave, the Lennon to
Truffaut’s McCartney, and kept his radical imagination to the very end
• Godard di...
*Best Picture*
Black Panther
BlacKkKlansman
Bohemian Rhapsody
The Favourite
Green Book
Roma
A Star Is Born
Vice
*Director*
Alfonso Cuarón, *Roma*
Yorgos...
Sometimes when I watch a movie I'm surprised by its similarities to an
older movie. I'm not talking about remakes here, just movies that borrow
some inspir...
Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends
We're so glad you could attend
Come inside! Come inside!
Wait, let's try that again:
Welcome back my ...
The "chick flick" musical is probably one of the sub groups that receives
the worst comments from people who do not appreciate "chick flick" movies.
I thin...
I am alway so unsure about adaptations. Somehow they make people too lazy to read the original book (which is often better than the movie). But on the other hand, I really love films like Sense and Sensibility. Tough call. But I do try to read the books before the movie comes out.
ReplyDeleteOne of my favourite examples is Atonement. I read the book and immediately fell in love with it. It is one of my favourites and I always hoped there would never be a movie adaptation. But after watching the movie I was quite impressed by it. It doesn't come evne close to the book, but as a movie, it is great and I enjoyed watching it. But everyone should still read the book. I guess, they just have to be seen as completely different things.
I know a lot of people feel that way about adaptation and I try to understand it but as a movie-lover first who then became a book-lover, it's hard for me to see them together as a unit. I find film and books so entirely different that I look at the writing of the screenplay, portrayal of characters, directing, editing as all belonging to one medium that has nothing to do with "staying true to the novel". I love adaptation and I think it takes some of the best stories out there and gives them new meaning and visual substance (though not all good, for sure) because I really love the medium generally but it's different for everyone. I really respect the ambition of adaptation over everything. I can't be harsh about it because then some of my fave movies would never exist.
ReplyDeleteOf course, read the book. But it'll be different experience and sometimes not as good (I will be nice and not give you my list) and sometimes better (Lord of the Rings, Ella Enchanted, Harry Potter, Jane Eyre, and so much more). But I don't think it's a requirement or that it somehow makes you less of a fan because you love the movie and not the book or even vice versa.
Film is just as substantial as written work. Some of us are visual learners and it doesn't make us lazy.
Thanks so much Vanessa!
You really think HP is better as a film? I kind of think the films are "kiddyfied"...I love them, don't get me wrong, but the books are way more interesting and scary (coming from a 25 year old...haha!)
ReplyDeleteI havnt finished reading LOTR..too long..too tedious..so I agree with you there!
I don't necessarily mean better, mostly just as good or better. HP is difficult because there are moments in the films that never happened in the books. And every HP film is different, Goblet of Fire sucked as a movie and rocked as a book. But Order of the Phoenix was better as a movie and Prisoner of Azkaban was amazing as a book and a film. I just love seeing the stories visually in film.
ReplyDeleteLotR is hard too because the first seven or so chapters (before you meet Strider) are really difficult to get through but after that I couldn't stop, and I was 15 or so. I really love the movies though because they're more modern and have moments that weren't in the books.
I have a theory about books being turned into movies that I was going to save for a post but I will post it here:
If a book is flawless and fantastic than the chances for the movie are not good. Book-lovers will complain that it's not as good and it will most likely be true. But for the books that aren't so perfect, maybe they lack plot, character development or interesting dialogue, they can only get better with a good screenwriter and director. It happened to the fifth Harry Potter, Order of the Phoenix, and I was rooting for Twilight as well. It definitely happened with any Nicolas Sparks novel that has been made into movies.
Thanks Vanessa!